↓ Skip to main content

Natural Sleep and Its Seasonal Variations in Three Pre-industrial Societies

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
254 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
509 Mendeley
Title
Natural Sleep and Its Seasonal Variations in Three Pre-industrial Societies
Published in
Current Biology, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2015.09.046
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gandhi Yetish, Hillard Kaplan, Michael Gurven, Brian Wood, Herman Pontzer, Paul R. Manger, Charles Wilson, Ronald McGregor, Jerome M. Siegel

Abstract

How did humans sleep before the modern era? Because the tools to measure sleep under natural conditions were developed long after the invention of the electric devices suspected of delaying and reducing sleep, we investigated sleep in three preindustrial societies [1-3]. We find that all three show similar sleep organization, suggesting that they express core human sleep patterns, most likely characteristic of pre-modern era Homo sapiens. Sleep periods, the times from onset to offset, averaged 6.9-8.5 hr, with sleep durations of 5.7-7.1 hr, amounts near the low end of those industrial societies [4-7]. There was a difference of nearly 1 hr between summer and winter sleep. Daily variation in sleep duration was strongly linked to time of onset, rather than offset. None of these groups began sleep near sunset, onset occurring, on average, 3.3 hr after sunset. Awakening was usually before sunrise. The sleep period consistently occurred during the nighttime period of falling environmental temperature, was not interrupted by extended periods of waking, and terminated, with vasoconstriction, near the nadir of daily ambient temperature. The daily cycle of temperature change, largely eliminated from modern sleep environments, may be a potent natural regulator of sleep. Light exposure was maximal in the morning and greatly decreased at noon, indicating that all three groups seek shade at midday and that light activation of the suprachiasmatic nucleus is maximal in the morning. Napping occurred on <7% of days in winter and <22% of days in summer. Mimicking aspects of the natural environment might be effective in treating certain modern sleep disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 260 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 509 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 474 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 86 17%
Researcher 83 16%
Student > Master 65 13%
Student > Bachelor 54 11%
Other 33 6%
Other 109 21%
Unknown 79 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 66 13%
Psychology 62 12%
Neuroscience 52 10%
Social Sciences 24 5%
Other 114 22%
Unknown 108 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1855. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#5,366
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#59
of 14,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30
of 298,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#2
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.